beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.29 2016구단2087

국가유공자 등록거부처분 등 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 10, 1979, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from active service on April 30, 1984 by the First Lieutenant on the part of the Army.

B. On January 29, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that, in addition to the Plaintiff’s statement, there was no objective data confirming the identity of a person of distinguished service to the State, the Defendant does not constitute a soldier or policeman on duty or a soldier or policeman on duty, on the ground that the Defendant did not have any objective data verifying the identity of a person of distinguished service in addition to the Plaintiff’s statement.

C. On August 14, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) received a re-registration certificate of facts related to requirements and applied for re-registration on an application basis; and (b) on December 19, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination that the Plaintiff does not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On February 23, 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on April 22, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute, Gap 1, Eul 1, 2, and 4

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made by the plaintiff, among the FTC training (the comprehensive tactical training for soldiers), who was dissipant of the general assembly bridge, and was injured by dividing the back of the scambling with the scambling with the scambling with the scambling with the scambling, and the disease of this case occurred by conducting a scambing operation with the scambing operation, so there is a proximate causal relation between the plaintiff's performance of official duties at the above branches of the

B. 1) Article 4(1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State.