The part concerning the crime of 2, 3, and 4 in the original adjudication shall be reversed.

Defendant 2, 3, and 4 at the time of the original adjudication.

The sentence of the lower court (the first crime at the time of the original adjudication: imprisonment with prison labor for four months, the suspension of execution for one year, and the second, third, and fourth crimes at the time of the original adjudication: imprisonment with prison labor for three years) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

At the time of the original adjudication, the defendant did not submit the grounds for appeal regarding the first crime. The grounds for appeal submitted by the defense counsel and the petition of appeal submitted by the defendant are not indicated in the grounds for appeal concerning this part, and even after examining the judgment below, there is no ground for reversal after investigating this part ex officio.

Basic crimes within the scope of recommendations for sentencing guidelines for the crimes of Articles 2, 3, and 4 at the time of original adjudication: Special robbery [Determination of types] strength, general standards, Type 2 (Special Robbery) [Special Robbery] mitigation element: In the area of mitigation [Scope of Recommendation], in the area of mitigation of punishment, in the area of imprisonment for a period of two years and six months to four years: Fraud [Determination of types], in general fraud, in the area of mitigation [Special Convict] - in the area of mitigation of punishment [Scope of Recommendation], in the area of larceny [Determination of Punishment], in the course of one month to one year, and in the second year: Theft [Determination of types of punishment], in the area of larceny [Special Larceny], in the general property] - Partial mitigation element of punishment [Scope of Imprisonment], in the area of mitigation of punishment [limited to the scope of punishment], in the area of imprisonment with prison labor], in the majority of the victims of four months to one year and one year and one year and one year and one year and two crimes committed against the accused employees.

However, the defendant led to confession of the facts charged in this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the amount of damage in this case is relatively minor, and the defendant agreed to most of the victims in the court below, and in particular, in the court below.