When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

A. On July 09, 2018, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, did not sell alcohol to the victim D, who is a business owner, under the influence of alcohol within Ulsan-gu B C market on July 09, 2018.

Ninnife shall be discarded.

L. L. L. L.W.

좃 같은 거 한번 해보 까. 경찰청, 검찰청, 법원 내가 다 아는데 니 알아서 해라.

It is a former police officer.

"Along with the 30 minutes of age", it interfered with the victim's work by force, such as putting the cell phone on the table table and cutting the cell phone on the table.

B. Special intimidation: (a) on July 9, 2018, the Defendant 09:00 around 09:00, on the street in front of the F cafeteria cafeteria, in which the Defendant: (b) was flicked; and (c) on the part of the victim G who was seated there, the Defendant Daced with the victim G, who was her seated, “hicked in the interest of

In the phrase of "only a quidal shoulder", the victim was able to avoid the fluored place, and the victim was threatened by carrying a dangerous object as the fluor is moving away from the victim, thereby threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (on-site reports and CCTV images);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Articles 284 and 283(1) (the point of special intimidation) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the confessions and reflects against the defendant, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as set forth in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered, taking into consideration the following circumstances: