1. False entry, false entry, and electromagnetic records;

A. The Defendant, Nos. 1 and 2 (Defendant A) of the annexed Crimes List No. 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant A”) was a back-of-the-date of G’s rice field. On August 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) obtained a proposal from G to “the so-called “age corporation,” which is the representative member of the Defendant, to establish a deposit account in the name of the corporation; and (b) transferred passbooks, cash cards, etc. connected to the deposit account, and (c) gave consent to G, thereby holding the Defendant’s certificate

G around that time, although there was no fact that the “H” and “I” were established for a limited partnership company and limited partnership company, G prepared an application for registration of incorporation of a representative member “A,” a partner with limited liability,” and a representative member “A,” a member with limited liability,” a member with limited liability, and a “I” for a limited partnership company with two floors each of the “I” in front of the head office, and delivered documents necessary for each of the above applications for registration and application for registration to the Defendant.

On August 2, 2011, the Defendant submitted to the competent public official an application for the establishment registration of a corporation with respect to “H” of a limited partnership company falsely prepared as above, and had a public official in charge of the Defendant enter the above application in the corporate register of the commercial registration information system. On August 9, 2011, the former District Court filed an application for the establishment registration of a corporation with respect to a limited partnership company “I” which was falsely prepared with the former District Court’s registration, and had the public official in charge of the said application enter the contents of the said application in the corporate register of the commercial registration information system.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with G is a public official as shown in [Attachment 1] No. 1 and 2.