2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case as committing the crime of this case and tried to live in good faith without reoffending in the future, and that he agreed with the victim E.

However, the Defendant had been punished several times since 2009, including the punishment for fraud, etc., and on February 25, 201, after being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and released from prison and having been released from prison for three months on February 25, 2011, the Defendant committed the thief crime against the victim C only for three months despite the period of repeated crime. The victim C did not agree with the victim C up to the trial. The actual damage of the victim E is not recovered, and the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc. are considered as a whole, and the lower court’s punishment does not seem to be unreasonable in light of all the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, including the following circumstances.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.