손실보상금증액
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the ground for appeal or incidental appeal is not significantly different from the content alleged in the court of first instance, and it is recognized that the first instance court’s adoption of the court’s appraisal, etc. and determination of the amount of compensation for losses is justifiable even if the evidence adopted by the court of first instance and the evidence submitted by the court of first instance showed each of the statements or images of evidence Nos. 17 through 21 (including the numbers
Therefore, the reasoning for the judgment of the court concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is decided to accept this by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and since the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are without merit, all of them are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.