Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is the purport of the claim and the appeal.

A. The Plaintiff is a person who engages in the manufacturing business of metal sales, etc. with the trade name called “D” in Nam-si, Namyang-si.

B. The defendant is a company that manufactures and sells food additives.

(c)

From around 2015 to February 14, 2019, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the products, such as OH v. Dr. Dr. Cr. Cr. Cr. Cr. Cr. Cr.

(d)

On April 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that the Plaintiff deliver to the Defendant each product column in the separate sheet of the product unit price in the separate sheet according to the pre-existing unit price column of the same Table (hereinafter “existing unit price”).

E. Around early 2017, the Defendant’s representative director E requested the Plaintiff to extend the stillbirth processing to the Plaintiff at a hole in which the Austria (OH) air conditioners are fixed to exchange the pande of the air pande, and to extend the size by 600m x 600m x 560m x 560m x a hole in which the plastic hold is attached.

F. Since then, the Plaintiff supplied the products reflecting the above request to the Defendant, and issued an electronic tax account statement for the price that reflects the amount in each column of the increase unit price in the attached sheet of the product unit price in the attached Form from January 26, 2017 to January 29, 2019 (hereinafter “increased unit price”).

G. On May 23, 2019, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that demands the payment of the outstanding amount of KRW 28,700,000,000, and the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a certificate of content that the outstanding amount cannot be acknowledged as being unilaterally increased by the Plaintiff on May 29, 2019.

H. On September 2, 2019, the Defendant paid KRW 10,430,00 to the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion of the cause of claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendant, at the request of the Defendant around early 2017, perform further processing and expand the product size.