beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.10.12 2018고단1542

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a sexual traffic business with the trade name “E” located in the Da 3, 202, 403, etc., Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Incheon. F is the head of the foregoing business establishment, G, H, and I, who is an employee engaged in sexual traffic.

From Jun. 2016 to Aug. 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had female employees engaged in sexual traffic, including G, find the said business place; (b) had them engage in sexual intercourse with many unspecified male customers, such as J, etc.; and (c) received 130,000 won per man from the said male customers to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning F, H, J, G, or I;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. The facts constituting the crime of this case, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Sexual Traffic, etc.; Article 19 (2) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc.; Article 19 (2) 1 of the Imprisonment with prison labor, the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case; the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic and advertising about the business of arranging sexual traffic is commercialized, thereby impairing a sound sexual culture and good morals; the defendant's act of advertising about the business of arranging sexual traffic is not easy in light of the criminal law of this case, including the act of leasing a place of business on the ground of others and advertising using the Internet with high possibility of spreading; the defendant was punished for probation on the ground of the crime of this case; the defendant was sentenced to the punishment of suspending the execution on the ground of the crime of this case; on July 21, 2015, without being aware of the fact that the above judgment became final and conclusive on the ground of the crime of this case;