특수공무집행방해치상
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed a report at “C cafeteria” located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun on July 21, 201; and (b) received a report at around 112; and (c) sent to E, a police officer of Jincheon-gun, Police Station D Do; (b)
씨 발 그냥 꺼져 라 ’라고 말하며 손으로 E의 목 부위를 수 회 때리고 주먹으로 E의 얼굴 부위를 때리고 손으로 E의 가슴을 수 회 밀치고, 옆에 있던 위 D 지구대 소속 경사 피해자 F(43 세) 이 테이져건을 이용하여 제지하자 손으로 피해자의 팔을 잡아 비틀면서 ‘ 뭐야 씨 발 나한테 테이져건을 쏴 ’라고 말하고 피해자를 향하여 주먹을 휘두르고 이에 피해 자가 피고인을 피하자 손으로 주변에 있던 돌을 피해자를 향해 2회 던지고, 이후 지원을 위하여 현장에 출동한 위 D 지구대 소속 경사 G에게 ‘ 넌 또 뭐야 개새끼야, 눈 파 버린다 ’라고 하며 손으로 G의 가슴 부위를 때렸다.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the processing of report by F, who is a police official, and at the same time suffered from the injury of the above arms, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment to the victim F.
Summary of Evidence
The application of the laws and regulations to the Defendant’s legal statement F, G, and E, the police statement H, and I’s statement 112
1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;
2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of serious injury).
3. Selection of sentence of alternative imprisonment;
4. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the following reasons for sentencing).
5. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for taking lectures and community service orders;
1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than seven years;
2. That the sentencing criteria are not applicable to ordinary concurrent crimes.
3. The crime of this case, which was decided to be sentenced, is at a restaurant by the defendant.