부당노동행위구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
On September 15, 2014, the plaintiff is a regional trade union established for eight public officials of the Gu/Si/Gun, including Daegu Metropolitan City and Daegu Metropolitan City, Daegu Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, achieved Gun, Dong-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and Jung-gu.
The plaintiff shall be referred to as "user 1-6 of this case" in the order of Daegu Metropolitan City, Southern-gu, Seogu, achieved-gun, Dong-gu, Seo-gu, and Jung-gu (hereinafter referred to as "the order"), and "the user of this case" shall be referred to both as "the user of this case" from January 8, 2016 to the same year.
3. Until August 2, 2018, asserting that the failure to comply with collective bargaining four times was an unfair labor practice of refusing and refusing collective bargaining, and filed an application for remedy with the Gyeongbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission on March 22, 2016, and the Gyeongbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for remedy on May 20, 2016.
The Plaintiff filed an application for reexamination with the National Labor Relations Commission on June 10, 2016, and the National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for reexamination on August 29, 2016.
(hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination” (hereinafter referred to as “instant decision on reexamination”). (In fact that there is no dispute with the grounds for recognition, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire purport of the instant decision on reexamination as to legitimacy of the adjudication on reexamination of reexamination of this case, the instant employer, who asserted that the Plaintiff is entitled to submit the list of union members in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act without any legal basis, has refused
The employer of this case requested the list of union members who are not superior to the collective bargaining while the employer of this case decided and announced the plaintiff as the collective bargaining trade union, and unilaterally suspended the collective bargaining, so unfair labor practice is obvious, the defendant's decision on reexamination of this case shall be revoked.
It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.
Facts of recognition
In light of the overall purport of the pleadings, the following facts are recognized in each of the above evidence, evidence Nos. 3, and evidence Nos. 1 to 7 (including branch numbers, if any).
The current status of the public official trade union in the instant users is as follows.