A. On March 2013, the Defendant provided convenience, such as accommodation and meals, and provided 30,00 won, to juvenile D ( female, 13 years of age) released from the Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, 304, which is his/her own residence, at the beginning, and provided sexual intercourse with the Defendant.

B. On May 2013, the Defendant paid for the aforementioned D and provided accommodation and 2,000 won in the above place, and provided sexual intercourse for the purchase of sex by the Defendant.

C. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant paid the above D accommodation and 50,000 won at the above place and provided sexual intercourse for the purchase of sex by juveniles.

2. The judgment of the defendant also acknowledges the fact that the defendant provided accommodation to juvenile D, such as as stated in the facts charged, and provided money, and that he provided D and sexual intercourse.

However, “The act of purchasing child or juvenile sex” means “the act of offering or promising to offer money or other property benefits, duties, convenience, etc. to children or juveniles, etc. for consideration” (Article 2 subparag. 4 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse). Whether the defendant has a relation with the act of offering accommodation, etc. to D with sexual intercourse is examined.

As shown above, D's investigative agency and the statement in this court are the sole evidence (as long as the defendant denies its content in this court, the written statement submitted by the defendant to the police and the written statement of the police interrogation of the defendant against the defendant), and D made some of the statements that seem to recognize the above consideration relations.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., that is, D’s answer to the question of whether the police “it includes a sex relationship on the terms of giving money.”