beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.05.21 2013구단25521

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 26, 2010, the Plaintiff is a person who was employed by the U.S. Armed Forces Support Group and worked for C at the B Distribution Center in the U.S. military supply base (hereinafter “instant workplace”) from April 1, 2010 to August 2, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff’s repeated use of heavy articles in the instant business establishment and conduct the business of repeating them, and thus “the injury of this case” is called as “the injury of this case.”

The defendant filed an application for medical care benefits on July 9, 2013.

However, on the ground that the circumstance of the award is not clear and the causal relationship between the work and the injury and disease of this case is not recognized, the defendant's application of the plaintiff is "disposition of this case".

(1) 【No dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff takes charge of loading and unloading of goods while working in the workplace of this case, and knenee knee is knee.

The inspection conducted repeated work.

This work is a work that causes a great burden to knenee, and the Plaintiff began to receive medical treatment by being knee-knee-free on July 2012, and eventually, the instant wound was diagnosed on October 2012.

Therefore, the instant standing disease was caused by the Plaintiff’s business that bears a burden on knee, and thus, the proximate causal relation between the above standing branch and the Plaintiff’s business is recognized. Therefore, the instant disposition that rejected the Plaintiff’s application on a different premise is unlawful.

B. (i) From April 1, 2010, the Plaintiff started with the instant workplace as C and D’s position, and promoted it to C(E-Driving) on December 1, 2010, and TechnicalF.

The plaintiff's work is confirmed to be accurate and proper labels are attached to the articles to be stored.