beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.12.07 2016고합29

공직선거법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant and G were those who were members of H political parties from July 1, 2010 to serve as the I market, the head of a local government, and G were those who participated in the election district of the 20th National Assembly member election of the 20th National Assembly member implemented on April 13, 2016 and participated in the election.

(b) No criminal facts shall conduct an election campaign except as provided for in the Public Official Election Act prior to the election campaign period, and the head of a local government who takes office through an election shall conduct an election campaign.

1) On March 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Public Official Election Act of Korea on March 12, 2016, attending the Jeju-do mountainous district event of “K” on March 12, 2016, and joined the bus returned to I from G on March 13, 2016, along with G on the bus’s 21:00, and 38 electors, who are members of the mountain association boarding the bus, wishing to support the H political party. Then, G appeals against the above voters at the same time before the election campaign period for H political parties and G, while it was not possible to carry out an election campaign at the same time before the election campaign period for H party and G, the Defendant was unable to carry out an election campaign at the same time, and the Defendant was unable to participate in the election campaign at the same time in the election campaign for the public candidate’s non-party and the candidate’s non-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party-party party-party party-party party.

2. As to the violation of the principle of an indictment only

A. The gist of the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion stated the same contents as the "fact of prosecution" in the indictment while instituting the prosecution of this case. The defendant and his defense counsel stated the same in the indictment.

참조조문