마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession to the entire crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that the investigative agency stated the Defendant as to the person who sold merptopy (hereinafter referred to as “prophone”).
However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant with approximately 1.0,00 won of 1.1g of phiphones, and approximately 0.03g of phiphones have been administered once in light of the method and contents of the crime. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 1 year at the Busan District Court on September 6, 2013 due to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act, etc. on the one-year suspension of execution, etc. on the other, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 12, 2013, the crime of this case was committed again during the period of suspension of execution, and there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered after the judgment of the court below, and other crimes of this case were committed within the sentencing range with respect to the same and similar cases, age and character of the defendant, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., and the sentencing guidelines imposed by the court below as follows: ① the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind and annexed crimes of 2 or more years, etc.