2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs are small-scale restaurants, gymnasiumss, beauty parlors, etc.

B. B is a company using the sn beam beam projector to conduct public relations and advertisement as an agent, and C, the representative of B, proposed that the plaintiffs should install the sn beam projector and transmit the advertising images of the companies received from the plaintiffs' operating enterprises and B to the outside glass window for three years free and at least three years after the free payment of the costs for the free lease of the company's advertising in the outside glass window. The costs for purchasing the sn beam projector installed in the store were paid in installments with loans from financial institutions in the names of the plaintiffs, but the principal and interest of the loan will be paid in lieu of advertising proceeds in B.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs, as indicated in the attached Table, designated Donyang Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dongyang Life Insurance”) as a loan recipient, concluded each loan contract (hereinafter “each of the instant loan contracts”) with Defendant Dongyang Social Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Doesta Social”) and Defendant Doesa Social Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Doesa Social”) as indicated in the attached Table.

C. On December 6, 2016, Defendant Dongyang Life Insurance transferred the claim for the loan to Plaintiff A under the instant loan agreement to Defendant Lee Cyp Capital Loan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Eyp Capital Loan”), and notified the Plaintiff of the assignment of the claim on the same day.

C was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for four years on December 1, 2016 with Suwon District Court Sung-nam Branch 2016Kadan182, on the grounds that the Defendant, including the Plaintiffs, had the victims conclude each of the instant loans and acquired loans received by Donwon from Donwon.

After that, the above judgment was dismissed in the appellate court (the District Court 2016No9058), and C withdrawn the appeal (the Supreme Court 2017Do6402) and became final and conclusive May 16, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.