However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant: (a) reported on the road in front of C pharmacy located in C on June 30, 2017 at Samyang-si, C, and on the road in C, in front of C, and on the road in which D and E are parking problems; and (b) while there are a large number of traffics both E and E, he/she received proper character education from the victim D; (c)

The young son is softened that this son can be deducted from this son as soon as possible. This son would be subtracted from this son.

“I wished to do so,” and the victim F, who reported it, expressed the victim F, “I am for the past, for the past, the past, the past, and the following. I am for the past to do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties would incur from the time and place specified in paragraph 1 on a parking issue.

“A police box sent to the scene after having received 112 reports,” “A police officer affiliated with the patrol box,” shall be treated promptly as “Abs.”

In addition, this test results are fluencing.

If so, we do not need to keep a bomer.

“Chacker and Happed with a sound, and H refrained from it, and H “Ch N NA” is a policeman.

Before the end, I expressed the desire to be called the “sacracks”, saw the H’s shoulder at once by drinking, and the security guards belonging to the G police box prevented the Defendant, and I expressed I the desire to “sacracks” to “sacracks,” and assault I by hand at once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to I, H, D, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the service of the G police box (a copy) and the 112 Report Processing Cases;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act ( point of insult), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (within the scope of the sum of long-term punishments) to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;