2. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant with a knife, which is a deadly weapon, and assaulted the victim F, and was committed by the police officer H and I upon receiving a report and causing an injury to the police officer H and I by putting the knife of the knife, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the fact that the Defendant is flying off the Defendant’s wrong mind in depth; (b) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol during the treatment of depression; (c) the victim H and I’s injury is not much severe; (d) the Defendant deposited part of the money for the victim H and I; and (e) the victim F was under the agreement with the victim F when he was in the trial; (c) there was no history of punishment exceeding the fine; (d) the Defendant did not have any history of punishment; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior and environment; (e) the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the recommended sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, the motive, means and consequence of the

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.