beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.11.08 2013누14186

조합설립인가처분무효확인

Text

The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the part of the 5th to 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance (so, the enforcement Decree of the Do administration law or without any reason) is deleted; and (b) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (c) the 6th of the 17th of

2. In the trial of the party, the supplementary part of the Plaintiffs asserts to the purport that the Intervenor’s association has legal interest in confirming that the instant authorization disposition is null and void in order to recover property damages infringed upon by the Intervenor’s association and to win in the relevant lawsuit, as the Intervenor’s association took strong relocation before the management and disposition is publicly announced, thereby causing property damage to the Plaintiffs, as well as filing a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs.

However, there is no legal interest in seeking confirmation of invalidity of the establishment approval of this case only with the grounds asserted by the plaintiffs. Thus, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is unlawful and dismissed, and the decision of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.