[Criminal Records] The case: the Seoul Northern District Court's judgment that damaged public goods on October 27, 2015: Imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months/ suspended execution for 2 years: Final Court's decision on November 4, 2015 / [criminal facts]

1. On August 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported around 02:50 on August 14, 2016, 2016, on the frontway in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; and (b) the slope E affiliated with the Seoul East-gu Police Station D commander of the Dong-gu Seoul Police Station that called “the students are fighting on their body” to restrain persons involved in the assault case, “the body fighting on the crosswalk is provokinged down on the crosswalk; and (c) whether the Party E assistant was per se to control the governance of this weather;

Magio Magio

“Absing the bath,” and assaulting E by hand, as they can be pushed down with the breast of E, as they are being pushed into drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting duties.

2. On October 23, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on October 23, 2016: (a) on the front line of G in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul on October 23, 2016, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by the police officer J of the Seoul East-gu Police Station D Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report on his body with H, H, I and his body fighting, and was arrested as a flagrant offender by the police officer J of the Seoul East-gu Police Station; and (b) on the patrol line, the Defendant was the front

On October 23, 2016, around 03:35, the Defendant used the Defendant to take the direction opposite to the watchkeeping room in the Seoul Eastdong Police Station located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and used the Defendant at the direction opposite to the duty room, and used the Defendant at the direction of J, “I am flae flaf by setting off and cutting off the knife of J, and amflae the knife of J, and amflaf by walking the right direction of J at one time due to the anger.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 reporting process of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes of each police statement protocol to E and J;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 of the choice of punishment.