양수금
1. Defendant B’s appeal shall be dismissed;
2. Defendant A’s appeal is dismissed.
3. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendants.
1. ex officio determination as to the legitimacy of Defendant B’s subsequent appeal, as to the legitimacy of Defendant B’s subsequent appeal, health room, and “reasons for which the parties cannot be held liable” under Article 173(1) of the Civil Procedure Act refers to the grounds for not being able to observe the period despite the parties’ due diligence to perform the procedural acts. In a case where documents of lawsuit are unable to be served by means of ordinary means during the process of litigation and served by public notice, the first delivery of a copy of a complaint to the parties are different from the case where the lawsuit was served by public notice from the first delivery of a copy of the complaint to the case where the lawsuit was conducted by public notice, and thus, the parties are obliged to investigate the progress of the lawsuit. Thus, if the parties failed to investigate the progress of such lawsuit and thus fail to abide
(1) On October 11, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Eastern District Court for a payment order under the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2006 tea17370 on December 6, 2006, and Defendant B filed an objection on March 3, 2007 after receiving the original copy of the above payment order from the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul, and on March 13, 2007, the instant case was performed as litigation. The court of first instance served the notice on the date for pleading to the Defendant B on the said domicile but was not served on the addressee on August 27, 2007 as the addressee’s address on September 19, 207, without being served on the addressee’s address on September 27, 2007, and the court did not serve the said notice on the date for pleading 1 as the addressee’s address on September 19, 207 without being served on the addressee’s domicile on September 10, 2007.