However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2014, at around 21:55, the Defendant: (a) purchased the knife knife knife, which is a dangerous object at a nearby convenience store, and (b) purchased the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife the part of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif knif knif knif knif.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on injury relief;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the method of the crime, the implements used for the crime, the degree of injury of the victim, etc., the defendant's responsibility is unlimited, but after committing the crime, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim after committing the crime, the fact of the crime is opposed to the time of the crime, and the suspension of qualification or heavier punishment has no criminal record, and the defendant