beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.09 2014나11510

대여금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "6 million won" in Part 6 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "5 million won," "H in Part 7 of the same Act," "N in Part 4, No. 14 of the same Act as "D," "No. 23, 2008," "No. 23, 2007," and "No. 16 of the same Act" in Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "No. 15 of the same Act," "No. 23, 2007."

9. The phrase “22.....” is respectively dismissed as “2..,” and the statement between 3.5 and 4.11.

In addition to using "the part related to the loan of KRW 20 million" as follows, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

【Supplementary Use】

A. The plaintiff alleged on October 31, 2007 that he borrowed 21 million won to C, and as designated by the defendant, 5 million won with D's account on October 31, 2007, and 1.6 million won with E's account on November 5, 2007, and 1 million won with E's account on November 5, 2007, and 1 million won with E's account under E's name, and 1 million won with I's account on November 1, 2007, and 20 million won with the defendant's obligation to repay to the plaintiff on November 5, 2007 (1 million won with the defendant's awareness that he borrowed 6 million won with F's obligation on November 5, 2007, 10 million won with the defendant's obligation to pay 2 million won with C's debt reimbursement (2 million won with the defendant's debt reimbursement of 1 million won).