beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.03.22 2018고단112

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to robbery, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Branch Branch, and the period of parole was expired on December 24, 2014 during the execution of the sentence and on April 25, 2015. On October 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor due to special injury, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 23, 2017.

In addition to other accomplices, the Defendant conspired to receive insurance money from the insurer of the victimized person after intentionally paying a traffic accident while driving.

1. On February 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) conspired with N,O, and C to commit an open bid with N, C, in collusion with N,O, and C, the Defendant andO, and C agreed to share the role of driving the Runa vehicle on the roads near the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Cheongcheon-dong; (b) the Defendant and C agreed to share the role of the partner of the said rocketing; and (c) N was found to have changed the course of the rocketing in the future of the said rocketing; and (d) partially received U-driving T car.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above N,O, and C, caused a traffic accident caused by negligence, and claimed insurance payment to the victim KB non-life insurance company, which is an insurance company for T-car, and obtained delivery of KRW 5,406,020 in total in the form of agreement from February 26, 2015 to June 17, 2015, such as the first re-written list of crimes.

2. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant conspired with C, Q, and P to commit the crime of conspiracys with the Defendant, in collusion with C, Q, and P, the Defendant: (a) on the roads near the death distance in the Dong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (b) on October 17, 2015, the Defendant assumed to share the role of driving the first passenger car; (c), Q, and P to share the role of the first passenger of the said new body; and (d) the Defendant discovered a X-car of the WW that changed the future course of the said new body.

Accordingly, the defendant is a traffic accident caused by negligence in collusion with the above C, Q, and P, and the victim who is the insurance company of the above X-car.