A. The Plaintiff is a person who was admitted to the hospital operated by Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”) and received medical treatment, and the Defendant C is a dental surgery doctor belonging to the Defendant hospital.

B. The Plaintiff feel the right shoulder, and from September 11, 2017, the same year.

9. By 21. 21. He/she shall visit and receive medical treatment three times at a hospital, and the same year;

9. 25. The defendant hospital was hospitalized in the defendant hospital and received a diagnosis of the escape certificate of light signboards 4-5-6 times in the following year, and discharged the following day.

(c)

The plaintiff is hospitalized in the defendant hospital again on September 27, 2017, and the following year is affixed to the defendant hospital.

9. On 28. 28. Defendant C received from Defendant C the removal of crypical and scirical signboards and the removal of crypical signboards once in the latitude 4-5, and the crypary crypary 5-6 times in the longitude (hereinafter “the instant operation”).

After undergoing the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at F Hospital on September 30, 2017, and was hospitalized at the F Hospital on September 2, 2017, and was subject to 4-5-6 pact removal and emulculation at the foregoing hospital (hereinafter “the instant re-operation”), and was diagnosed on the escape certificate of 4-5-6 pactonculatory disc.

Since then, the plaintiff received rehabilitation treatment from the above hospital on October 28, 2017, and was hospitalized in G hospital on October 30 of the same year and received treatment until June 15, 2018, and the same year.

6. 18. He was hospitalized in H hospital and received medical treatment until October 4 of the same year.

E. At present, the Plaintiff is suffering from a impairment of pedestrian disability caused by the right-hand part and a serious right-hand part, and as a result, it is serious obstacle to pedestrian traffic, and it is difficult for the Plaintiff to independently and independently conduct daily life on the right-hand part (hereinafter “instant obstacle”). [Grounds for recognition”) without dispute, each description of Gap’s evidence Nos. 6 through 10, Eul’s evidence Nos. 3 and 4(b) (including various numbers), the result of physical appraisal entrusted to the I Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The plaintiff's assertion.