However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 03:06 on January 20, 2017, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112 to the effect that “C” located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Cheongju-si, and “the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol”, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of public duties in relation to the report of this case by assaulting the 112 police officers, a police officer belonging to the D District of the police station corresponding to the Cheongju, who called “E and F, a police officer who is a police officer belonging to the D District of the police station corresponding to the Cheongju-gu, who was called, from the road.” In doing so, the Defendant expressed a desire to read “F’s shoulder, e.g., cut off the vehicle running on the road,” and continued to interfere with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting the E’s fat, such as huming the fat, in good hands.

Summary of Evidence

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of the Defendant’s legal statement E, F’s police statement report 112

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da11