Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On October 6, 2017, at the main point of “C” located in Suwon-gu B and 3 Busan, Busan, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports; and (b) requested to pay the drinking value and return back to the site from the border E belonging to the Busan, Southern Police Station D branch of the D branch of the Busan, Police Station D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the Busan, which called the site; (c) put him/her back his/her card tag on several occasions; and (d) continuously restrain him/her from doing so.

In doing so, “the 112 police officers engaged in the handling of reported cases by assaulting the 112, such as creating a threat as to E with a lush hand, and bating fat with a lush hand, thereby obstructing the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers in charge of handling reported cases.

2. 경범죄 처벌법위반 피고인은 같은 날 01:50 경 부산 수영구에 있는 부산 남부 경찰서 D 지구대에서, 경찰관에게 “ 씨 발 내가 뭘 잘못 했노” 라며 소리지르고, 지구대 내를 돌아다니는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 약 1 시간에 걸쳐 관공서 내에서 거친 말과 행동으로 주정하거나 시끄럽게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the investigation report (main driver's circumstantial report), each investigation report, investigation report (the photographing of a mobile phone interfering with the performance of official duties and the cancellation of the main owner of a government office shall be accompanied by the images recorded in the cancellation of the main owner of a mobile phone), and the cell

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the selection of fines) concerning criminal facts, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of liquor within the official document, and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order requires violence to the police officers who called out to the frighter within the main place, and thereby, is arrested in the act of crime.