도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, three years of suspended sentence, two hundred hours of community service, and forty hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unfford;
2. The Defendant’s previous convictions were reached five times, and the Defendant’s previous convictions were two times, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the same period of suspension of execution, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant case reaches 0.142%. However, it appears that the Defendant appears to be suffering from the instant crime, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., and it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s sentence is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant sentencing records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime.
3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.