(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.06.28 2013고단1016
도로법위반
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. C’s act of violating the restriction on vehicle operation on the road prior to the Myeon Office in the front of the Myeon Office in the case of Ansan-si on September 13, 1994, which is an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged; 2. The penal provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (the Constitutional Court Decision 201HunGa38, Oct. 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2010HunGa17, Jul. 30, 2009). As such, the penal provisions applicable to the summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문