A. The Plaintiff is a legal spouse who completed the marriage report with C on July 8, 2014.

B. Around 2015, the Defendant was able to work in the same strike with the workplace, such as C, and became able to make payment.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, purport of whole pleading

2. Determination

(a) A third party who has a liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple's communal life falling under the nature of marriage, such as interfering with a married couple's communal life by interfering with another person's communal life;

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441 Decided May 29, 2015 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441, May 29, 2015). In full view of the overall purport of pleadings, the following circumstances are as follows: ① the Defendant, from the end of the end of 2017 to the point of view, has brought about private contacts and communications between C and two hundred thousands, such as opening of a Bande, giving and receiving pictures and messages; ② the Defendant love the Defendant; ② the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, “I any other knowledge”; and (b) the Plaintiff, “I want to report”; (c) even after the end of June 2018, the relationship between the two persons, the Defendant and C continuously exchanged with the Defendant, and (d) the Defendant had been engaged in health examinations around October 4, 2018; and (c) the Defendant maintained the relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s spouse’s mental suffering; and (d) the Defendant’s mental suffering.