손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the additional selective claims filed by this court are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the judgment 2 of the first instance is as follows: (a) 4 acts below the first instance judgment 4 acts as follows: “The plaintiff suffered property damage 62,650,000 won from expenses, such as dental clinic interior works and facility expenses; and (b) the plaintiff and internal patients are obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered emotional distress due to the plaintiff's failure to use the front of the dental clinic as a parking lot; and therefore, (c) it is reasonable to calculate the consolation money as KRW 10,000. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff 62,650,000 won (= property damage 62,650,000 won (or KRW 62,650,000) from among damages due to the non-performance of obligation or the warranty liability (or KRW 63,693,792 won) and damages for delay thereof (or KRW 693,792).”
[Judgment of the court of first instance, even if the evidence duly examined by the court of first instance shows evidence Nos. 5 through 10 (including the number of branch numbers) submitted by the plaintiff in this court, the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance is justifiable, and there is no error as alleged in the ground of appeal by the plaintiff. 2. The judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages, is justified as the conclusion is consistent with this, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal and the claim for consolation money selected by this court are all dismissed as it is without merit.