Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Defendant

A is a person who works as a C gas station employee.

On February 25, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendant mistakenly heard that the victim E (the age of 19) visited the Fabur XD vehicle to be milked to the vehicle of the Fabur XD in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, “I am essential.”

During that period, the victim stated that the victim "in this lot is included....", it means "whether the victim is not a habitual offender," and assaulted the victim's neck at one time and one time by means of smuggling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs and CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that his act constitutes self-defense or a legitimate act, since the Defendant merely supposed young victims by supposed threats.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as follows: (a) at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, the victim was living together with the Defendant at the time of the first opening of the victim’s neck, but the Defendant was living together with the Defendant and the victim in Australia; (b) the Defendant was living together with the Defendant and the victim; (c) the Defendant’s club fee fell into the Defendant and the victim; (d) the Defendant was living together with the victim at a close location during the occurrence of the instant case; (e) the Defendant was living together with the victim; and (e) the Defendant was living together with the Defendant and the victim at night; and (e) the instant case occurred during the night, but it is difficult to view that the name of the victim was relatively brightnessd to the extent that the location of the instant case was threatened; and (e) the victim was the victim.