임대차보증금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 2, 2015 to February 3, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
1. The following circumstances revealed by the Plaintiff, based on the facts that there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the statement in Gap evidence 1 through 5, the witness Eul's testimony and the overall purport of pleadings, and ① a lease contract with the term of lease deposit of 40 million won with respect to D Building A, a period of lease of 40 million won, and the term of lease from December 16, 2013 to December 16, 2014, were entered into between E and the defendant's name are stated in the column of the lease contract. ② Since C, an assistant of the above lease contract, at the time of the lease contract, paid the lease deposit to the Plaintiff by 1,00,000 won to the defendant who is not E, even if the Plaintiff attended the lease contract at the time of the above lease contract and clearly stated that the actual owner E, who is the owner of the above leased object, was the owner of the leased object of 2,000 won to 1,000 won.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.