However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant thought that the victim C (the 39-year-old) who is a workplace ward, was likely to suffer a usual daily treatment, and the defendant had a complaint against the victim.

At around 11:00 on May 15, 2013, the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant did not hear the horses of other workplace rent, Co., Ltd. E, E, E, U.S., U.S., U.S., E, U.S., E, U.S., for the victim’s face, exceeded the victim’s face when drinking, and had the victim suffered injury, such as an influoring flads, etc., in need of treatment for about 56 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the sentencing conditions favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) is the primary offender; (ii) the attitude of the crime of this case is inferior; (iii) the degree of damage of the victim; (iv) the defendant deposited at the investigative agency for the victim; and (iv) million won after the closing of argument; and (iv) the family relationship of the defendant, etc. shall be determined in the same sentence as the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.