사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, against the victim B, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of his/her own parts with the trade name “D” from November 2015 to May 2016, 2016.
person is a person.
On January 2016, the Defendant would pay the price of raw materials to the Victim B Co., Ltd. after one month after receiving the main raw material by supplying plastic raw materials.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, the Defendant had a debt of at least 40 million won without any specific property at the time, and due to the decline in the supply unit price of the suspected parts produced by the Defendant, the Defendant was unable to make profits through the operation of the aforementioned “D,” and rather, there was a situation in which the enemy operation of the “D,” and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the price normally even if the Defendant received plastic raw materials from the injured party.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and such deceivings the victim from February 1, 2016 to the same year.
4. The supply of plastic raw materials worth KRW 119,133,950 in total by up to September 19.
2. Crimes against victims E;
A. From October 1, 2015, when the Defendant was notified by the victim E that his/her obligation to pay for the unpaid goods would amount to KRW 17,851,900 on April 18, 2016 and that the provision of the parts would be suspended, the Defendant, who was receiving the notification from the victim, led to the suspension of the provision of the parts. As such, he/she had by deceiving the victim as if he/she would have paid for the unpaid goods.
On April 18, 2016, the defendant will receive a loan from the victim by taking the apartment house that has not paid the price for the goods as security.
Loans shall take place in the following weeks:
The purpose of this paper is to make a false statement to the effect that the parts are "..........."
However, in fact, the F apartment No. 412, No. 102 of the F apartment No. 412, which the defendant had resided at the time, was not owned by the defendant.