The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

C On September 15, 2017, after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 23, 2017, due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in support of Sungnam-gu Friwon, the judgment was finalized on September 23, 2017.

Defendant

A is a person working as the managing director from February 24, 2017 to the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office D’Etel aggregate buildings, and Defendant B is a person appointed as the managing manager of the above building around February 15, 2017, and Defendant F is the vice president of the G Co., Ltd. entrusted management by the managing body of the above building.

On December 30, 2016, at the Seoul Central District Court, the Defendants accepted an application for the prohibition of performance of duties against H, the representative of the existing management unit of the above building owned by the owners of the above building. On August 10, 2017, even though a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution on the ordinary general meeting and the extraordinary general meeting led by the above H was accepted, the Defendants still carried out the management duties on the ground that it is still pending in the appellate trial, and were used for the management duties of the Defendants by securing accounting data, etc. on the management affairs.

On September 11, 2017, at around 08:30 on September 11, 2017, the Defendants came to the management office, which is a building managed by H from the second underground damaged person of the above building, and entered into the office by opening an replaced lock device in advance through the light key string of the preceding p.m.

As a result, the Defendants conspired into a structure managed by the injured person.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness I and H;

1. On-site photographs and photographs;

1. Previous Records: In the case summary information inquiry and the text of the judgment (the Suwon District Court Branch Branch 2017 order 1638) [the Defendants and the defense counsel at the time when they received the decision of prohibition of performance of their duties, the victim was already subject to the decision of prohibition of disposition, and the Dispute Settlement Council, which is an existing entrusted controlled entity, had already received the withdrawal, and the accounting data for the management of the building of

Therefore, the management office of the Defendants.