However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 11, 2014, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report that the Defendant was carrying on drinking in the “Ding Kinging Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing at the said King Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing, and obstructed the Defendant’s Defendant’s instant Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing Doing

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;