beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.03 2013노1723

건설산업기본법위반

Text

The judgment below

Among the crimes committed against Defendant C, each of the crimes listed in the annexed Table 1 through 5 of the List of Crimes, and Defendant A, B.

Reasons

(1) The Defendants were aware of the fact that Defendant C participated only in receipt, supplied materials and supplied them to the Defendant C and received only necessary expenses. (9) The labor cost of the said construction site was paid directly to the Defendant C in 2008, and (1) since 2009 on the basis of various tax invoices, copies of deposit passbooks, etc., the Defendants asserted that labor cost was paid to the Defendant B directly from the Defendant B. However, in relation to the “F court 315 legal subcontract” concluded on June 15, 2009, the payment record was discovered from the Defendant C’s office on July 7, 2009, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, 300,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.