When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 23, 2017, at the entrance of the fourth floor of the Seo-gu Gwangju Building around 23:00 on June 23, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the CCTV in an amount equivalent to 270,000 won at the victim C owned by the corridor installed in the corridor on the ground that he/she photographs himself/herself.

2. On June 24, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the fourth floor corridor of the place specified in paragraph (1) around 14:00 on June 24, 2017, by cutting off one CCTV amounting to KRW 270,000 at the market price managed by the victim D, who is the head of the management affairs office, for the foregoing reason.

3. On August 26, 2017, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the CCTV unit equivalent to KRW 270,000 at the market price owned by the victim C for the said reason at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around August 17, 2017, around August 26, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Each written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (specific suspect, attachment of CCTV image data, attachment of video CDs in the event of a criminal suspect's crime, attachment of a written estimate for damage, and filing of relevant summary orders);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime. Article 366 (Selection of Penalty Surcharge)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;