except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 20, 2017, the Defendant entered into a contract with D, E, the joint initiative of convening a general assembly for dismissal of the head of the C Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association on March 20, 2017 as the representative of the consulting company.

On April 8, 2017, the Defendant held an extraordinary general meeting for the removal of the president of an association opened in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, but at least a majority of the union members failed to receive service costs due to his/her failure to appear, the Defendant committed a forgery of the list of the members present to the effect that

1. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 18:00, at an association temporary office located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the fact was signed by 20 members of the association in the column of members present at the “register of persons present at the site” although there was no fact that 20 members were present as indicated in the attached list, or signed the name of the association members using the Defendant’s unmanned

Accordingly, the defendant forged the list of the participants of private documents related to the certification of facts.

2. The Defendant: (a) delivered the list of members present at the same date and place as described in paragraph (1); and (b) delivered it to D and E without knowledge of the fact that it was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E or D;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the CHousing Re-designated Project Association's articles of association, list of on-the-spot visitors, a copy of A00 copies, a fingerprint appraisal result, and the minutes of a general meeting for removal of

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of each private document) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. In the event that one joint signature document under the name of several persons is forged under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the crimes of forging each private document and between the crimes of uttering of each private document) the several crimes of forging each private document are established, and each of the crimes of forging each private document is an ordinary concurrence relationship.