When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:55, at the C convenience store located in Sinsan City B; (b) at around 112, a customer, who was on convenience store, was reported to 112, sent to the site by the head of the Sinsan Police Station D District Unit of the Sinsan Police Station, and (c) took the Defendant, and (d) took a bath for the said E’s chest by hand, and assaulted the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fat

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse prevents police officers from performing their official duties by using violence. However, the degree of interference with the use of violence and official duties of this case is not severe, and the injured police officers expressed their intent to obstruct the Defendant’s wife. The Defendant committed all the crime of this case, and there is no criminal conviction beyond the fine, and the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, character and character, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, including the following circumstances.