When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, around 01:45 on June 28, 2015, at the main point of “C” located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul and without paying the drinking value, is punished by D and vagabonds, who is the operator of the above main point.

12 Upon receiving a request for returning to Korea from F by the police officer affiliated with the Sungnam Police Station Estation, which was called out after receiving a report, the police officer sent to the Sungnam Police Station: (a) expressed his desire to “I will see to do so; (b) will not do so; (c) will do so; and (d) by drinking once a part of the above F’s right part of the said F, the police officer interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the said F’s 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. 112 Report statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of a fine (the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is against the defendant, and the degree of a fine is relatively weak and there is no record of a fine or more severe punishment, and the fact that there is no record of the same crime).

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;