A. Defendant B shall pay KRW 37,259,491 as well as 20% per annum from March 22, 2012 to the date of full payment.

(a) Defendant B, on the basis of responsibility, is the owner of the Ethler vehicle volume (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”);

Defendant B did not pay any attention to F while driving the key of the Defendant vehicle. At around 00:32 on December 28, 201, the F, while under the influence of alcohol 00:32% of the blood alcohol level, he driven the Defendant vehicle while driving the Defendant vehicle and driving the Defendant vehicle in the direction of the He Logistics Center located in G in etern G in the direction of the flow of the center in the oceanside, due to the negligence of breaking the central line, and the front part of the I Twitter vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”) driven by the Plaintiff in etern part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle, which was driven by the Plaintiff in etern, was shocked with the front part of the Defendant vehicle, for about three weeks of treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The F died on January 29, 2012 while receiving treatment for the instant accident, and Defendant C, his wife, succeeded to the 3/5 shares, and the 2/5 shares of Defendant D, his wife, respectively.

[Based on the recognition] Defendant B: Defendant B is liable for damages under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act as the operator of the Defendant vehicle for the personal damages of the Plaintiff, according to each of the following facts: Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 2-1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, and Gap evidence No. 4, and the overall purport of the pleadings.

Furthermore, Defendant B is liable for tort liability under Article 750 of the Civil Act as to the Plaintiff’s physical damage, because it was negligent in breach of the duty of care in keeping the keys of Defendant B.

In addition, as the heir of F, who is a tort, Defendant C and D are jointly and severally liable to compensate for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident with Defendant B.

B. Defendant B’s assertion that Defendant B had subscribed to automobile insurance with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle, so the insurance company compensates the Plaintiff for damages and compensates the Plaintiff for the damages.