However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

No person may lend a means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any consideration.

On March 7, 2019, the Defendant sent to a person (one person C) whose name is unknown at no more than B, and paid KRW 2,400,000,000 per day by 80,000,000 per day from the phone and for the purpose of receiving the above consideration, the Defendant sent to a person whose name is not known at F, one check card connected to the D Bank Account (E) in the name of the Defendant, and notified the G Mesen of the above password.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access to financial institutions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A detailed statement of transfer of damage amount;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing ACIF and account transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 6 (3) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions;

1. Determination of the same sentence as the disposition shall be made by comprehensively taking into account the following conditions of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime:

The circumstances unfavorable: The fact that the victim was incurred due to the account lent by the defendant, and the circumstance that the defendant had the record of punishment for the same past: The confession of the crime of this case