When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a father and a medical specialist working in the "D Hospital" located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

On October 2, 2013, at around 21:21, the Defendant was hospitalized in the above hospital for the only part of the king operation of the victim E (A. 33 years of age).

In the case of performing the king operation, several businesss are put in the patient's clothes, etc. to absorb the patient's taking over and the blood transfusion. In such a case, the defendant, who is a medical doctor, has a duty of care to check whether the dys, surgery tools, etc. put in the patient's clothes, etc. before the dysing of the dys of the dys of the dys of the dys of the patient remains and remove them completely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and added the body to the part of the victim’s clothes while the head of the business remains, and eventually, the above business was left unattended in the part of the victim’s clothes for about 15 days. As a result, the victim performed an emergency opening operation on October 17, 2014 due to the pain and heat of the part of the clothes, and the agricultural flasing in the mouth.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim by occupational negligence to suffer injury such as the occurrence and aggravation of farming, etc. in a duna, in which the number of days of treatment cannot be known, and the occurrence and aggravation of the duna, and the duna, and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the documents to be submitted by the complainants subparagraph 1 (Compulsory Records-D hospital), subparagraph 2 (Compulsory Records-Inbound Hospital) of the documents to be submitted by the complainants, subparagraph 3 (Compulsory Records-Inbound Hospital) of the documents to be submitted by the complainants, subparagraph 4 (Certified Copies of Medical Certificates-in Hospital) of the documents to be submitted by the complainants;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case.