For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the primary facts of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime, and acquitted the Defendant on the grounds that there was no proof of crime on the ancillary facts of this case added by

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles as to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.