However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, along with the wife C, was a person who resides in the D Apartment 107 Dong 1051, 1051, and C continued to suffer from tobacco in the house even though it is not good for the engine land.

The Defendant, at around February 10, 2017, destroyed or damaged the murder and dysia while having a dispute over C with the issue of smoking tobacco at around February 21, 2017.

F. F. F. F. F. F. F. “S. E. E. E.S. E. E.S. E. E.S., called “I. E.S. E.S. E. E.S.E.”

I heard the word “,” and b), I expressed to F three times the word “F in drinking” to the effect that “F” is “F.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs concerning damage to property and obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation, the fact that the defendant had a record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime and has committed the instant crime while being protected and observed as a home protection case, consideration is given to the fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects it, that the defendant agreed with the police officer subject to the instant crime while continuing the instant trial, and that the defendant has an old age.