2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On February 19, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with tourism and Tong (B-2) sojourn status on February 19, 2015, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on March 17, 2015.

B. On April 15, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter the instant disposition) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 1, 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's head of the plaintiff's assertion threatens that the plaintiff's religion is not a slicker but a slicker, and that the plaintiff's slicker will kill a baby.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case that did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even if the plaintiff's return to Egypt is highly likely to suffer from gambling.

(b) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows:

1. The term "refugee" means a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected from the country of his/her nationality due to well-founded fear that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a stateless foreigner who, owing to such fear, is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she resided before entering the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as "state of his/her nationality");

C. “persecution” which is a requirement for recognition of refugee status 1 refers to “an act causing serious infringement or discrimination against essential human dignity, including threats to life, body, or freedom,” and such an “act is shocked.”