A. The sentence of one-year imprisonment sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor together with regard to each of the allegation of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor, the crime of this case is not good, such as exercising violence against the aged victims and threatening them, and the Defendant committed the crime of this case again without being aware of it during the suspended execution period due to the crime of injury, etc., the degree of injury suffered by the victim D is not easy, the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victims, and the Defendant committed multiple criminal offenses due to the crime of violence, etc., disadvantageous circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the facts charged in this case, reflects his mistake, and returned the stolen bicycle, and other favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., and other favorable conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments, and thus, it is not recognized that the Defendant and the prosecutor’s each of the arguments of unfair sentencing are too heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, each of the grounds for appeal by the lower court are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.