Judgment

The Defendant was punished for not less than five times due to drinking driving, and, in particular, on November 29, 2013, committed the instant crime during the suspension period even if the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than ten months, and an order to attend a course was issued by this court, again committed the instant crime during the suspension period.

This is very high risk of repeating a crime because the defendant repeats the crime without any reflect, despite the court's prior decision that sentenced the suspension of execution or fine on driving under the repeated drinking of the defendant.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the pleadings of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of sentence is inevitable, and the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.