On July 16, 2011, 16:55, the Defendant: (a) in front of the unit D at Ansan-si, a member-gu, an Ansan-si; (b) during the operation of a car, the Victim E, who is a dangerous object in the vehicle, that the victim E has been crypted in front of the vehicle with the Aluminium material, which is a dangerous object in the vehicle.

In other words, the victim's head and the part of the victim's body 5 and 6 times, the victim's face exceeded the floor was taken several times, and the victim was suffering from an unsatisfying of the number of days of treatment, and the victim was suffering from an unsatisfying dub with no open address in the two parts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. A written diagnosis of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (pacted F Telephone);

1. A favorable circumstance is that the reason for sentencing under Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts is recognized and against the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea.

However, the damage from the crime of this case is not recovered (the defendant and the defense counsel paid 10 million won to the victim as medical expenses).

However, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence adopted and investigated by this Court, that is, the defendant would pay medical expenses to G, the victim's partner.

In full view of the witness G’s legal statement and its attitude to the effect that the victim had not received KRW 10 million from the Defendant that he had been receiving medical treatment at the hospital, the Defendant paid KRW 10 million to the medical expenses.

The crime of this case cannot be determined by a person). The sentence of imprisonment is inevitable in light of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the course and method of the crime, and that the defendant escaped for five years.

In light of the above circumstances and the conditions of sentencing as stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the disposition is ordered.